Review: The Maze Runner by James Dashner


Title: The Maze Runner

Author: James Dashner

Publisher: Random House

Genre: YA, Science Fiction

Rating: 2 out of 5 stars

Upon finishing this book, two questions kept mulling around in my head: 1.) Why are so many YA titles, especially genre fiction, part of a series? 2.) Why does it seem like so few current authors truly know how to write a series of books?

One of my biggest pet peeves is when I start a book thinking I’m reading a stand alone and then realize part way in that it is part of a series. I’m not totally against series in general.  I read the entire Dark Tower series by Stephen King and enjoyed it immensely.  The Joe Ledger series by Jonathan Maberry is one of my favorite ongoing series and I also highly enjoyed The Rot & Ruin series by the same author.  Growing up I also devoured every Babysitter Club & Fear Street book I could find.  What do these books have that The Maze Runner doesn’t? Simple, a beginning, middle and most importantly an end.  The structure of this novel annoyed the hell out of me.

I picked up this novel because I happened to see the preview for the upcoming movie while seeing Divergent with my sister for my birthday. If it hadn’t been so close to my yearly Birthday Book Buying Binge, I probably would have gotten this book from the library. The movie preview piqued my interest in reading the book. I really hope they structure of the movie is better than the novel, or audiences may walk out.

The plot of this story is simple. A boy named Thomas is mysteriously deposited among a group of young boys living in a meadow surrounded by an elaborate maze. They spend their days rebuilding their own society, complete with leadership and jobs, while looking for a way out of the maze. The boys, including Thomas, have no memories of their lives before The Glade and The Maze.  Problem one: This book spends the first 100 or more (out of a 374 page book) exploring The Glade (the central meadow and home base) and its inhabitants.  There is little to no action in the first third of the book.  Every time Thomas tries to ask a question about his surroundings, the boys are either extremely rude to him or they just have no information to give him. The whole “memory wipe” thing is a convenient device as we learn this may not be Thomas’ first encounter with the maze, but is frequently dropped when he has to recognize common every day objects, plants or animals. It’s a selective memory wipe. Problem two: Thomas asks a lot of questions that either never really get answered or just have answers that are kind of inexplicable.

About two-thirds through the book, Thomas meets Minho, a Runner in the maze. Keep in mind that this is the first time the reader encounters anyone who has even spent any real time in the maze and this book is called The Maze Runner. For whatever reason, Thomas feels a strong urge to be a Runner and manages to be rewarded by becoming one for rescuing Alby, the group leader and Minho when they get stuck out in the maze after dark.  After dark is when these things called Grievers, attack the maze.  The Grievers are part biological and part robotic  and a pretty weak villain for this story.  The walls of The Glade close every night so the Gladers are not even really threatened by The Grievers until much later when everything starts to go to hell.

That is when the book picks up, when everything starts to go bad.  The changes start when The Box, the device that delivers supplies the boys need, also supplies an ending to this maze experiment in the form of a young girl. Another selective memory wipe: The boys, some who have lived in The Glade for two years, have never had a girl live among them. So how do they know what she is? And how do they know that they’re supposed to assume she’s weaker than them because of her gender?  The girl and Thomas obviously have some sort of connection but it’s not quite clear what that connect is beyond that it gives them the ability to speak telepathically to one another. In my mind, this should make the boys think they are are in the presence of some sort of deity but they seem to recognize she is human.The girl’s appearance is very important for the End Game in the last 50 pages of the book but her presence in the Glade for most of book is pretty useless and she spends a lot of her time in a coma.

The last 50 pages is when the boys decide to take matters into their own hands and fight back against whomever put them in the maze. I thought it was really strange to have all the action pick up and present more questions as the book came barreling toward an end.  Turns out it isn’t so strange if you are aware that there are two more books that follow this one.  This book doesn’t quite end with a cliff hanger but it doesn’t answer all questions in a satisfactory manner either.   I leave this review with the questions I had at the end of this book: Was Chuck actually Thomas’ brother? Or were they just close friends? Are Teresa and Thomas headed toward a Luke & Leia type awkward relationship? Is WICKED really good? What is this experiment?  I would really like to know the answers to these questions but I don’t feel I can trust that continuing with the series would answer them. I am too frustrated with the first book and the effort it took to complete it to really care to go on.  If anyone has any answers for me, please leave them in the comments.


Review: The Fault In Our Stars by John Green




Title: The Fault In Our Stars

Author: John Green

Publisher: Penguin

Genre: YA General Fiction

Rating: 2.5 out of 5 stars


I made a serious attempt to get my hands on a copy of The Fault In Our Stars before the movie came out.  Given that I work in a bookstore, this would’ve been easy except I’ve lately curbed my book spending.  If I can borrow it or get it from the library, that’s what I do.  So made myself #1000-something on my library’s hold list for both the hardcover and e-book edition.  I managed to get my hands on the hardcover edition 3 days before my sister and I planned on seeing the movie.  I can handle reading a book before or after seeing the movie adaptation but I’ve learned to never be in the middle of the book when you see the movie adaptation.  One instance leads to comparison, the other to spoilers.  I’m especially glad I followed this rule for The Fault In Our Stars because John Green was so intrical to the making of the movie.  However, now I end up feeling like I could have just seen the movie and not read the book.

Yes, here we have that occurrence so rare that avid book readers claim it never happens.  I liked the movie more than the book.  I found the book to be a bit pretentious, especially the character of Hazel.   That’s a bit ironic since I really connected with Shailene Woodley’s portrayal of Hazel and thought her version of Hazel was very likable.  This may have to do with the fact that you get more implications of person’s character in a movie and more description in a book. It’s the old “show don’t tell” adage.  The book reveals parts of of Hazel’s personality that just grate on my nerves. For example, the scene where Hazel first hangs out with Gus at his home, shortly after meeting him. They watch V For Vendetta because Gus thinks Hazel looks like Natalie Portman. When the movie is over and Gus asks her what she thought, this is part of Hazel’s internal thought process, “….It was kind of a boy movie. I don’t know why boys expect us to like boy movies. We don’t expect them to like girl movies.” But instead of saying she doesn’t like the movie, she lies to please him.  The movie cuts this internal monologue down to a single look that just implies she didn’t like the movie because she has different interests than Gus.  I know it’s being picky, but that line made me really dislike Hazel and John Green because it felt like he was writing a teenager gender stereotype. He’s never been a teenage girl so he has to run off the assumption that her priorities are boys, clothes, love and make up and, of course, staying alive.  I have been a teenage girl and I liked V for Vendetta  (the graphic novel more than the movie) and I like movies with storm troopers and zombies.  I think my teenage self would have been more attracted to Gus than Hazel should be.  They don’t seem to have much in common besides cancer.

It’s odd that some of Hazel’s reactions to things seem so immature when she is portrayed as a smart girl, wise beyond her years.  This book has some great moments where it speaks the truth about how the healthy interact with the sick or dying.  I even enjoyed the idea that Hazel’s favorite book stops mid-sentence and her quest to find out what happens after. I think this is an aspect of life that we all are curious about and it foreshadowed the end of this book. If it hadn’t, I would have found the abrupt ending more annoying. Peter Van Houten, the author of Hazel’s favorite novel  is both obnoxious and pretentious, making those sections of the book in Amsterdam almost unbearable to read.

All in all, this book is a simple love story between two “star-crossed” teenagers that wraps itself in huge ideas to seem important.  I enjoyed the story but don’t see why people think this is the BEST BOOK EVER. I’ve read better YA that managed to make me feel more emotions.  I guess I really wanted to feel destroyed emotionally by the end of this book and that just didn’t happen.  Even the movie made me cry harder.  Seeing the movie before reading the book didn’t lessen the end for me because this book makes it very clear how it will end almost on the first page.  What I didn’t expect was to not really connect with Hazel at all and fall for Gus instead. I guess, since it’s a love story, we’re all just supposed to fall for the guy.

The Coaster Book Challenge

I didn’t get a whole lot of new books for Christmas, but I did get some a couple really cool literary-inspired items.  I’ve decided to use two of these items to create a challenge.  My sister-in-law and brother bought me a set of literary-inspired drink coasters from Out Of Print. Each coaster represents a different book cover.  My boyfriend’s sister bought me the book Tequila Mockingbird: Cocktails With A Literary Twist by Tim Federie.  I’m not a big drinker, but I like puns and I do have a stocked bar cart that doesn’t get a whole lot of attention. The boyfriend and I probably should entertain more.  So I’ve decided to take the book titles and read each book while enjoying a cocktail inspired by that title.


  1. I must make the cocktail and drink it while reading the book at least once. I will get the boyfriend to take a pic.
  2. I reserve the right to not finish a book, because life is too short to force myself to read a book I hate. I must give the book until at least page 50.
  3. All cocktails will be finished 🙂
  4.  I will post a review of both the cocktail (with recipe) and the book when I am finished with them.

Book & Cocktail Pairings for Challenge:

Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov/The Lolita Cocktail

The Hound of The Baskervilles by Sir A. Conan Doyle/ The Adventures of Sherbet Holmes ( I may also make this for episodes of Sherlock Season 3 on PBS)

Catch-22 by Joseph Heller/ Catch-22 cocktail

Brave New World by Aldous Huxley/ Brave New Swirled

Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell/Victory Gin Gimlet

On The Road by Jack Kerouac/Wine Spodiodi

Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison/ The Invisible Man

Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen/ Rye and Prejudice

About half of these came from Tequila Mockingbird. The rest I found various places on the internet and I’ll post the links when I post my reviews.  While the books are set in stone (or on coasters) for this challenge, the drinks are not. If you have any suggestions for other drinks related to any of these books, please leave a comment. I can always make more than one drink during the course of reading one book.  Happy Reading!